MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2096617295 · doi:10.1094/pd-89-0888

Association of a Virus with Wheat Displaying Yellow Head Disease Symptoms in the Great Plains

2005· article· en· W2096617295 on OpenAlexaff
Dallas L. Seifers, T. L. Harvey, T. J. Martin, Steve Haber, Yi‐Min She, Werner Ens, Kenneth G. Standing, R. Salomon, A. Gera

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Disease · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNicotiana benthamianaBiologyVirusAntiserumInoculationVirologyPlant virusPolyacrylamide gel electrophoresisMottleGel electrophoresisHorticultureAntibodyMolecular biologyBiochemistryGeneticsEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wheat with yellow head disease (YHD) (yellow heads and mosaic leaf symptoms) has been observed in Kansas since 1997. A pathogen was transmitted from the infected wheat to maize by vascular puncture inoculation and to Nicotiana benthamiana by rub inoculation. The original infected wheat and infected maize and N. benthamiana test plants all produced a unique 32- to 34-kDa protein when analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Time-of-flight mass spectrometry analysis of the unique 32- to 34-kDa protein showed that the amino acid sequence was most closely related to the nucleoprotein of Rice hoja blanca virus, indicating that the virus causing YHD symptoms in wheat is a tenuivirus. Antiserum made to this protein failed to react with extracts made from healthy wheat or wheat infected with Wheat streak mosaic virus or the High Plains virus. The antiserum did react to extracts made from symptomatic wheat, maize, and N. benthamiana, shown by SDS-PAGE to contain the unique protein, and to extracts of wheat with YHD symptoms from Kansas, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Oklahoma. The name Wheat yellow head virus is proposed for this virus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.498

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant DiseaseSame topicPlant Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207