MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2096643153 · doi:10.1017/s0031182007003617

Mechanisms underlying reduced expulsion of a murine nematode infection during protein deficiency

2007· article· en· W2096643153 on OpenAlexaff
Thai Hien Tu, Kristine G. Koski, Marilyn E. Scott

Bibliographic record

VenueParasitology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyChemokineCytokineInflammationAtrophyHeligmosomoides polygyrusRatónImmunologyPathophysiologyLeptinNematodeNematode infectionImmune systemEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Balb/c mice infected with the gastrointestinal nematode Heligmosomoides bakeri were fed protein sufficient (PS, 24%) or deficient (PD, 3%) diets to investigate whether diet, infection or dose of larval challenge (0, 100 or 200 larvae) influenced gut pathophysiology and inflammation. Among the PS mice, worms were more posteriorad in the intestine of mice infected with 200 compared with 100 larvae, suggesting active expulsion in the more heavily infected mice. This was consistent with the positive correlation between worm numbers and fluid leakage in PS mice; similar patterns were not detected in the PD mice. Infection also induced villus atrophy, which was more pronounced in PS than in PD mice. Our cytokine screening array indicated that infection in PD mice elevated a wide range of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines. Whereas serum leptin concentrations were higher in PD mice, monocyte chemotactic protein-5 (MCP-5) in serum increased with increasing larval dose and concentrations were lower in PD than PS mice. We suggest that elevated MCP-5 together with villus atrophy may contribute to the apparent dose-dependent expulsion of H. bakeri from PS mice but that delayed expulsion in PD mice appeared related to a predominant Th1 cytokine profile that may be driven by leptin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.796
Threshold uncertainty score0.210

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueParasitologySame topicAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207