MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Neural inhibition of the corpus allatum in the last larval instar differs from that in adults in the blood-feeding insect,Rhodnius prolixus

2000· article· en· W2096704706 on OpenAlexaff
R. Gary Chiang

Bibliographic record

VenueArchives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Canadian institutionsRedeemer University College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRhodnius prolixusCorpus allatumInstarBiologyInsectLarvaJuvenile hormoneEndocrinologyInternal medicineMetamorphosisAnatomyIngestionBotanyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An active corpus allatum (CA) in the blood feeding insect, Rhodnius prolixus, releases a substance that inhibits metamorphosis in larvae, and activates egg production in adults. In adults, transecting the nervus corporis cardiacum II's (NCCII), which are attached posteriorly to each protocerebral lobe, greatly increases egg production indicating that the adult CA is activated and receives neural inhibition from cells associated with the NCCII [Chiang, Arch. Insect. Biochem. Physiol. 39:126-131 (1998)]. In the present study, the NCCII's in fifth instar larvae were transected immediately before or after feeding to determine if these nerves normally inhibit CA activity in the last larval instar. Approximately 20 to 25 days following ingestion of a blood meal, L5's with transected NCCII's emerged as fully-formed adults with no larval characteristics. Examination of the brain in these recently emerged adults revealed that the NCCII's were absent. Since fifth instar larvae with transected NCCII's emerged with no juvenile characteristics, cutting the NCCII's did not activate the CA, indicating that the mechanism for inhibition of the CA differs in the last larval instar and adult animals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.471
Threshold uncertainty score0.560

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchives of Insect Biochemistry and PhysiologySame topicNeurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchFrench-language works237,207