MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2096787731 · doi:10.1194/jlr.m048710

Identification of four novel genes contributing to familial elevated plasma HDL cholesterol in humans

2014· article· en· W2096787731 on OpenAlexaff
Roshni R. Singaraja, Ian Tietjen, G. Kees Hovingh, Patrick L. Franchini, Chris Radomski, Kenny K. Wong, Margaret vanHeek, Ioannis M. Stylianou, Linus Lin, Liangsu Wang, Lyndon J. Mitnaul, Brian K. Hubbard, Michael D. Winther, Maryanne Mattice, Annick Legendre, Robin Sherrington, John J.P. Kastelein, Karen Akinsanya, Andrew Plump, Michael R. Hayden

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Lipid Research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic Associations and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaChild and Family Research InstituteXenon Pharmaceuticals (Canada)
FundersEuropean Commission
KeywordsBiologyCandidate geneGeneticsGeneCholesterylester transfer proteinProbandMutationCholesterolLipoproteinEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Heritability estimates of 47-76% for plasma HDL cholesterol (HDLc) levels suggest that genetic variation plays a pivotal role in HDL metabolism ( 1-3 ). However, despite major advances in family-and population-based association studies ( 2, 4 ), most genetic causes of extreme HDLc levels in humans remain unknown. Cohen et al. ( 5 ) reported mutations in the established HDLc genes ABCA1 , APOA1 , and LCAT in only 12.4% of individuals with low HDLc (<5th percentile). Similarly, we reported that mutations in the known HDLc-regulating genes ABCA1 , APOA1 , and LCAT were found in 28.7% of unrelated individuals with low HDLc levels ( 10th percentile) ( We aimed to identify novel rare mutations with large effects in candidate genes contributing to extreme HDLc in humans, utilizing family-based Mendelian genetics. We performed next-generation sequencing of 456 candidate HDLc-regulating genes in 200 unrelated probands with extremely low ( 10th percentile) or high ( 90th percentile) HDLc. Probands were excluded if known mutations existed in the established HDLc-regulating genes ABCA1 , APOA1 , LCAT , cholesteryl ester transfer protein ( CETP ), endothelial lipase ( LIPG ), and UDP-N -acetyl- -D-galactosamine:polypeptide N -acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 2 ( GALNT2 ). We identifi ed 93 novel coding or splice-site variants in 72 candidate genes. Each variant was genotyped in the proband's family. Familybased association analyses were performed for variants with suffi cient power to detect signifi cance at P < 0.05 with a total of 627 family members being assessed. Mutations in the genes glucokinase regulatory protein ( GCKR ) , RNase L ( RNASEL ), leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptor 3 ( LILRA3 ), and dynein axonemal heavy chain 10 ( DNAH10 ) segregated with elevated HDLc levels in families, while no mutations associated with low HDLc. Taken together, we have identifi ed mutations in four novel genes that may play a role in regulating HDLc levels in humans. -Singaraja, R.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.659
Threshold uncertainty score0.377

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Lipid ResearchSame topicGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207