MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2096797002 · doi:10.1017/s0022112003005937

Internal wave excitation by a vertically oscillating sphere

2003· article· en· W2096797002 on OpenAlexaff
M. R. Flynn, Kristjan Onu, Bruce Sutherland

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fluid Mechanics · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOcean Waves and Remote Sensing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmplitudePhysicsEnvelope (radar)AttenuationRADIUSOscillation (cell signaling)CylinderMechanicsOpticsStanding waveClassical mechanicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The properties of waves generated by a vertically oscillating sphere in a uniformly stratified fluid are examined both theoretically and experimentally. Existing predictions for the wave amplitude and phase structure are modified to account for the effects of viscous attenuation. As with waves generated by an oscillating cylinder, the main effect of attenuation is to broaden the two peaks of the amplitude envelope on either flank of the wave beam so that far from the sphere the wave beam exhibits a single peak with a maximum along the centreline. The transition distance from bimodal to unimodal wave beam structure is shown to occur closer to the source than the corresponding distance calculated for the oscillating circular cylinder. For laboratory experiments, a recently developed ‘synthetic schlieren’ method is adapted so that quantitative measurements may be made of an axisymmetric wave field. This non-intrusive technique allows us to evaluate the amplitude of the waves everywhere in space and time. Experiments are performed to examine the amplitude of waves generated by small and large spheres oscillating with a range of amplitudes and frequencies. The wave amplitude is found to scale linearly with the oscillation amplitude $A$ for $A/a$ as large as 0.27, where $a$ is the radius of the sphere. Generally good agreement between theory and experiment is found for the small sphere experiments. However, the theory overpredicts both the amplitude and the bimodal-to-unimodal transition distance for waves generated by the large sphere.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.914
Threshold uncertainty score0.528

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations63
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Fluid MechanicsSame topicOcean Waves and Remote SensingFrench-language works237,207