Fatal Aspiration Pneumonia during Transition from Donepezil to Rivastigmine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To report a case of fatal aspiration pneumonia in a patient shortly after initiation of rivastigmine and discontinuation of donepezil, with no washout period between therapies. CASE SUMMARY: An 83-year-old white man presented to the emergency department in respiratory distress (O2 saturation 70%; RR 44 breaths/min) secondary to aspiration. He had started rivastigmine 1.5 mg twice daily that same day. The patient had been previously treated with donepezil 10 mg/d, and there was no washout period. He was intubated due to worsening respiratory status and was transferred to the cardiac care unit. He then became hypotensive and required dopamine and fluid support. Brief bronchoscopy revealed food particles in the lower airways and bile-stained secretions. Intubation was notable for the large amount of secretions. The patient died approximately 27 hours after presentation to the emergency department. Blood and sputum cultures were subsequently positive for Haemophilus influenzae. DISCUSSION: Cholinesterase (ChE) inhibitors approved for treatment of Alzheimer disease are associated with nausea and vomiting in a sizable percentage of patients, ranging from 5% to 31% in clinical trials. Most of these adverse events occur during the initiation/titration phase of therapy. An additive risk of adverse events may be expected with coadministration of ChE inhibitors or cholinergic agents or, potentially, with an inadequate washout period between such agents. Review of MEDLINE (1966-July 2002) and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-July 2002) failed to identify any previous reports of aspiration with rivastigmine or donepezil. CONCLUSIONS: A washout period should be considered when switching between ChE inhibitors to minimize the risk of vomiting and aspiration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".