MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2096800463 · doi:10.1095/biolreprod64.4.1264

X-Linked Inhibitor of Apoptosis Protein Expression and the Regulation of Apoptosis During Human Placental Development1

2001· article· en· W2096800463 on OpenAlexaff
Andrée Gruslin, Qing Qiu, Benjamin K. Tsang

Bibliographic record

VenueBiology of Reproduction · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCell death mechanisms and regulation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsXIAPFas ligandApoptosisBiologyInhibitor of apoptosisDNA fragmentationTUNEL assayProgrammed cell deathSyncytiotrophoblastCell biologyInhibitor of apoptosis domainWestern blotTrophoblastMolecular biologyPlacentaFetusCaspaseBiochemistryPregnancyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, we have examined the expression and potential role of X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP), Fas, and Fas ligand (FasL) in the regulation of apoptosis throughout placental development. Protein expression was determined by Western blot analysis and immunohistochemistry, whereas apoptotic cell death was assessed by DNA fragmentation analysis and TUNEL. The XIAP was present in trophoblast throughout placental development, but its content significantly decreased during late pregnancy, when apoptosis was maximal. The FasL content was low during early placental development but increased coincidentally to the decrease in XIAP during the third trimester. Our data also suggest that placental apoptosis is the culmination of the relative expression of these cell-death and -survival proteins, a phenomenon that is cell type-specific and dependent on cytodifferentiation and the stage of placental development. Moreover, the induction of syncytiotrophoblast apoptosis may involve the concomitant up-regulation of FasL for Fas activation and the removal of downstream inhibition of the apoptotic cascade by XIAP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.263

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations57
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiology of ReproductionSame topicCell death mechanisms and regulationFrench-language works237,207