Computational design of the Fyn SH3 domain with increased stability through optimization of surface charge–charge interactions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Computational design of surface charge-charge interactions has been demonstrated to be an effective way to increase both the thermostability and the stability of proteins. To test the robustness of this approach for proteins with predominantly beta-sheet secondary structure, the chicken isoform of the Fyn SH3 domain was used as a model system. Computational analysis of the optimal distribution of surface charges showed that the increase in favorable energy per substitution begins to level off at five substitutions; hence, the designed Fyn sequence contained four charge reversals at existing charged positions and one introduction of a new charge. Three additional variants were also constructed to explore stepwise contributions of these substitutions to Fyn stability. The thermodynamic stabilities of the variants were experimentally characterized using differential scanning calorimetry and far-UV circular dichroism spectroscopy and are in very good agreement with theoretical predictions from the model. The designed sequence was found to have increased the melting temperature, DeltaT (m) = 12.3 +/- 0.2 degrees C, and stability, DeltaDeltaG(25 degrees C) = 7.1 +/- 2.2 kJ/mol, relative to the wild-type protein. The experimental data suggest that a significant increase in stability can be achieved through a very small number of amino acid substitutions. Consistent with a number of recent studies, the presented results clearly argue for a seminal role of surface charge-charge interactions in determining protein stability and suggest that the optimization of surface interactions can be an attractive strategy to complement algorithms optimizing interactions in the protein core to further enhance protein stability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".