Reduction of cerebrospinal fluid and plasma serotonin in patients with post-stroke depression: A preliminary report
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations of serotonin in patients with post-stroke depression (PSD). METHODS: Serotonin was measured in 30 PSD patients and 30 controls on day 15 and day 30 following stroke. RESULT: There was a good correlation between the plasma and the CSF serotonin concentrations in both PSD (r = 0.641, P = 0.001) and control patients (0.852, P = 0.001) 30 days following the stroke. The average plasma and CSF serotonin concentrations in the PSD patients were lower than in the control group on day 15 (CSF: 0.24+/-0.27 vs 0.82+/-0.48 micromol/L, P < 0.01; plasma, 0.32+/-0.25 vs 0.83+/-0.45micromol/L, P < 0.01) and day 30 (CSF: 0.29+/-0.23 vs 0.78+/-0.47 micromol/L, P < 0.01; plasma, 0.31+/-0.33 vs 0.89+/-0.67 micromol/L, P < 0.01). Reduction of plasma serotonin was found in 90.0% of the PSD group and 13.3% of the control group patients (P < 0.01). Reduction in CSF serotonin in the PSD and control group was 80.0% and 6.7% respectively (P < 0.01%). CONCLUSION: Plasma serotonin levels may be used to represent the CSF serotonin levels in depressed and non-depressed patients following stroke. There is a reduction in the plasma or CSF serotonin concentrations in patients with PSD. Serotonin deficiency may be one of the factors leading to depression following stroke.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it