MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2097009045 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.141292

Upregulation of Thrombospondin 1 Expression in Synovial Tissues and Plasma of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Role of Transforming Growth Factor-β1 toward Fibroblast-like Synovial Cells

2015· article· en· W2097009045 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Takahisa Suzuki, Naoki Iwamoto, Satoshi Yamasaki, Ayako Nishino, Yoshikazu Nakashima, Yoshiro Horai, Shin‐ya Kawashiri, Kunihiro Ichinose, Kazuhiko Arima, Mami Tamai, Hideki Nakamura, Tomoki Origuchi, Chikara Miyamoto, Makoto Osaki, Kaname Ohyama, Naotaka Kuroda, Atsushi Kawakami

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAngiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRheumatoid arthritisTransforming growth factorThrombospondin 1MedicineSynovial membraneDownregulation and upregulationThrombospondinFibroblastSynovial fluidErythrocyte sedimentation rateSynovial jointImmunohistochemistryArthritisImmunologyInternal medicinePathologyOsteoarthritisBiologyIn vitroAngiogenesisGeneBiochemistryMetalloproteinase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of thrombospondin 1 (TSP-1) in RA. METHODS: Expression of TSP-1 in synovial tissues was determined by immunohistochemistry. Expression of TSP-1 in rheumatoid fibroblast-like synovial cells (FLS) was investigated by quantitative real-time PCR and ELISA. Correlations among the plasma TSP-1 and other variables in patients with RA were examined. RESULTS: Expression of TSP-1 was increased in rheumatoid synovial tissues. Transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) clearly increased TSP-1 expression in FLS on both mRNA and protein levels. Changes in plasma TSP-1 were associated with those in 28-joint Disease Activity Score-erythrocyte sedimentation rate and plasma TGF-β1. CONCLUSION: TSP-1 might be critically involved in the disease process of RA through the TGF-β1/TSP-1 axis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.392

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of RheumatologySame topicAngiogenesis and VEGF in CancerFrench-language works237,207