Lamivudine Can Exert a Modest Antiviral Effect against Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Containing the M184V Mutation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The M184V mutation in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) reverse transcriptase is associated with high-level resistance to both (-)2',3'-dideoxy-3'-thiacytidine (3TC) and (-)2',3'-dideoxy-5-fluoro-3'-thiacytidine as well as low-level resistance to 2',3'-dideoxyinosine, 2',3'-dideoxycytidine, and abacavir. This mutation is also associated with diminished HIV replicative fitness as well as several functional changes in enzyme activity, including diminutions in polymerase processivity, pyrophosphorylysis, and nucleotide primer unblocking. Despite the fact that M184V encodes up to 1,000-fold resistance to 3TC, we asked whether this drug might still display some antiviral effect in regard to viruses containing this mutation. Cell-free assays revealed that high concentrations of 3TC triphosphate (i.e., >100 micro M) could affect chain termination and/or inhibit purified reverse transcriptase containing the M184V substitution. This effect became more pronounced with elongation of reverse transcriptase products. In newly infected cells (i.e., peripheral blood mononuclear cells), we found that the amount of full-length reverse transcriptase product was diminished in the presence of 2 to 10 micro M 3TC, although no decrease in the first product of the reverse transcriptase reaction, i.e., minus strong-stop DNA, was observed. In the presence of two other HIV inhibitors, e.g., nevirapine and indinavir, 3TC exerted additive effects in tissue culture at concentrations only marginally higher than the 50% inhibitory concentration (IC(50)). Reverse transcriptases cloned from clinical isolates harboring M184V in the context of multidrug resistance had similar IC(50) values for 3TC triphosphate compared to reverse transcriptase containing only the M184V mutation. These results suggest that viruses containing M184V can retain a higher degree of sensitivity to 3TC than previously assumed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".