A Cusum-Based Multilevel Alerting Method for Physiological Monitoring
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alerting systems used by current physiological monitors are designed to detect changes in the levels of vital signs, but they tend to be very sensitive to artifacts. This paper proposes a method to detect changes in the direction of trend and generate multilevel alerts according to the statistical significance of the detection. One-point-ahead signal predictions are calculated by averaging the historical data with the weights decreasing in the past. The two-sided cumulative sums (Cusum) of the prediction errors are tested against multiple thresholds to detect change points with two levels of certainty. The temporal shapes of the detected changes are analyzed using heuristics to determine whether to trigger an alert. The method was tested offline using 20 cases collected during surgery at a local hospital. The detection results were evaluated by two experienced anesthesiologists. The direction of trend was correctly detected in 90.2% of the annotated changes for end-tidal carbon dioxide, 89.4% for expiratory minute volume, 91.8% for peak airway pressure, and 95.4% for noninvasive blood pressure. The certainty levels of the true-positive alerts estimated by the algorithm have a high ratio of agreement with the anesthesiologists' evaluations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".