MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2097104027 · doi:10.1139/g02-097

Comment on "PstI repeat, a family of short interspersed nucleotide element (SINE)-like sequences in the genomes of cattle, goat, and buffalo"

2003· letter· en· W2097104027 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Johannes A. Lenstra, Isaäc J. Nijman

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome · 2003
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologySinePstIInterspersed repeatGenomeGeneticsRepeated sequenceNucleotideHuman genomeDNAGeneRestriction enzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lenstra Nijman 175 Digestion of genomic DNA from cattle, sheep or goat by PstI produces a discrete band of about 500 bp, a restriction fragment of the Bov-B short interspersed nuclear element (SINE) (Duncan 1987; Majewska et al. 1988; Lenstra et al. 1993; Szemraj et al. 1995). Bov-B is shared by all ruminants and Bov-B insertions have occurred early on, as well as later, during the evolution of this suborder (Jobse et al. 1995; Nijman et al. 2002). Sheikh et al. (2002) have cloned, sequenced, and compared repetitive PstI fragments from the genomes of cattle, goat, and water buffalo. The 489-bp bovine fragment is similar to Bov-B and is designated as a type I PstI repeat. Surprisingly, an alignment (Fig. 4 from Sheikh et al. 2002) shows that a type II PstI repeat from goat and buffalo with the about same length is not similar to the bovine element (about 48% identity). Further, it is suggested that the goat and buffalo elements have evolved separately, whereas a BLAST search revealed a significant similarity of the goat repeat to bovine serine tRNA. However, an alignment of the same sequences (Appendix 1) as listed in Fig. 4 of Sheikh et al. (2002) shows that in fact Bov-B, represented by the database entry btrppst1, is similar to both the bovine type I sequence (77% identity) and the complementary strands of the goat and buffalo type II sequences (77 and 76% identity, respectively). Therefore, the separate positions of the type I and type II sequences in a phylogenetic tree (Fig. 5 of Sheikh et al. 2002) reflect the difference between complementary strands and there is no evidence for a separate evolution of the PstI repeats. Similarity of SINEs from several different species including the ruminant Bov-tA SINE to tRNA sequences has been observed repeatedly (Ogiwara et al. 2002). However, the BLAST match of the goat type II repeat to the bovine serine tRNA gene appears to be due to the presence of a Bov-B repeat element 636–240 bp upstream of the tRNA sequence, and ot because of any resemblance between the goat PstI repeat and the tRNA itself. In line with previous (Jobse et al. 1995) and more recent (Nijman et al. 2002) data, we conclude that the genomes of cattle, goat, and buffalo contain the same type of PstI SINE repeats, which is not derived from a tRNA sequence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0160.017
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenome→Same topicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies→French-language works237,207→