MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Long‐term zooplankton responses to nutrient and consumer subsidies arising from migratory sockeye salmon ( <i>Oncorhynchus nerka</i> )

2011· article· en· W2097132364 on OpenAlexaff
Guangjie Chen, Daniel T. Selbie, Bruce P. Finney, Daniel E. Schindler, Lynda Bunting, Peter R. Leavitt, Irene Gregory‐Eaves

Bibliographic record

VenueOikos · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersGordon and Betty Moore Foundation
KeywordsOncorhynchusZooplanktonPredationNutrientPlanktonTrophic levelJuvenileBiologyFisheryEcologyHabitatEnvironmental scienceFish <Actinopterygii>

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Migratory animals, such as Pacific salmon, can significantly shape communities in recipient habitats both by altering the flux of resources, and changing community composition and subsequent trophic interactions. Here we mainly used paleoecological records from natural sockeye salmon nursery lakes to quantify the response of plankton communities to the influx of salmon‐derived nutrients and consumers (juvenile salmon). Our long‐term data show that increases in the density of spawning salmon often elevated influx of nutrients, and, in turn, zooplankton production over the past few centuries. In contrast, significant correlations were not detected in two lakes with extremely low or high average spawner densities (i.e. 1.5 and 34.7 × 10 3 spawners km −2 year −1 respectively). With increasing spawner densities across lakes, analysis of the size structure of subfossils in sediments revealed a strong decrease in body size of a main juvenile salmon prey item ( Eubosmina longispina ; r 2 = 0.36, p &lt; 0.001, n = 67), consistent with an overriding effect of predation in lakes with high salmon densities. These long‐term data not only highlight the key role of salmon‐derived nutrients in stimulating plankton communities, but also suggest that the relative effect of nutrient and consumer subsidies varies along gradients of lake production, despite a single ultimate causal mechanism (migrating fish).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOikosSame topicFish Ecology and Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207