MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2097166318 · doi:10.1155/2014/358727

Workspace Classification and Quantification Calculations of Cable-Driven Parallel Robots

2014· article· en· W2097166318 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Q. J. Duan, Xuechao Duan

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Mechanical Engineering · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesUniversität RostockUniversität Duisburg-EssenUniversity of WaterlooNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaUniversity of DelawareNational Science Foundation
KeywordsWorkspaceWrenchRobotComputer scienceParallel manipulatorProperty (philosophy)Closure (psychology)SimulationControl theory (sociology)Control engineeringTopology (electrical circuits)EngineeringArtificial intelligenceMechanical engineeringControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Large workspace is one of the promising advantages possessed by the cable-driven parallel robots (CDPR) over the conventional rigid-link robots. This paper focuses on the dynamic analysis and workspace classification based on the general motion equation of cable robot and the unilateral property of cables. The combinations of different types of two conditions lead to several different types of workspace, including static equilibrium workspace, wrench closure workspace, wrench feasible workspace, dynamic workspace, and collision-free workspace. A qualitative comparison of different types of workspaces is performed. The simulation results verify the relationship between the several types of workspaces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.544
Threshold uncertainty score0.535

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Mechanical EngineeringSame topicRobotic Mechanisms and DynamicsFrench-language works237,207