Informer ou In-former : les formats journalistiques au service du statu quo.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Des etudiants quebecois luttent contre la hausse des droits de scolarite a l’universite. Ils bataillent sur de nombreux fronts : convaincre les etudiants sceptiques, combattre le gouvernement quebecois qui veut imposer cette augmentation, gagner la faveur de l’opinion publique. Une autre lutte, moins evidente mais tout aussi exigeante, est le combat contre les formats journalistiques : qui peut parler, de quoi, en combien de secondes ou en combien de lignes, sur quel ton, en opposition a qui, pourquoi, etc. L’article decrit ces formats journalistiques et leur impact sur le mouvement etudiant. La demonstration mene au constat que les formats journalistiques, les moules, favorisent le statu quo et compriment, enserrent le mouvement etudiant. Quebec students are fighting against increased university fees. Among their many parallel battles, the one against journalistic formats is a demanding task. Who can speak, about what, in how many seconds or lines, when, opposing whom, why, etc.: it’s a fight against in-formation. The article describes the journalistic formats and their impact on the student movement. The demonstration leads to acknowledging the fact that journalistic formats promote statu quo and encircle, imprison, the student movement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it