MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2097210837 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/nov061.87

MB-11 * IMPACT OF MOLECULAR SUB-TYPE AND CRANIOSPINAL IRRADIATION (CSI) DOSE ON RELAPSE OF MEDULLOBLASTOMA

2015· article· en· W2097210837 on OpenAlexaff
A. Wang, Sonia Partap, Kristen W. Yeom, Mesha Martinez, Hannes Vogel, Sarah S. Donaldson, Paul G. Fisher, Sébastien Perreault, Y.-J. Cho, Iris C. Gibbs

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedulloblastomaMedicineSubtypingWnt signaling pathwayInternal medicineOncologyNuclear medicinePathologyBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of craniospinal irradiation (CSI) dose and molecular sub-type on medulloblastoma relapse rates. METHODS: 115 medulloblastoma patients were treated with 18- ≥ 36 Gy CSI. Molecular subtyping data was done by nanostring assay [WNT, SHH, and Group 3/4 non-WNT/non-SHH (NWNS)]. A CSI dose schema based on prognostic implications of molecular subtype was devised: ≥36 Gy for M+ or Group 3; ≤18 Gy for non-disseminated WNT; 23.4 Gy all others. Relapse rates were assessed and correlated with CSI dose. RESULTS: After excluding patients with incomplete data, the final cohort included 36 subjects with median age 8.7 years (range 3.3–16.9) and median follow-up 4.1 years (0.2-3.7). Molecular subtypes were as follows: 2-WNT, 6-SHH, 28-NWNS. CSI dose was 18 Gy(11 cases), 23.4 Gy(9), and ≥36 Gy(16). CSI dose was divergent from the proposed schema in 18 cases (14-lower, 4-higher). There were 14 relapses (by molecular subtype: 0-WNT, 1-SHH, 13-NWNS; by histology: 8-classic, 5-LC/A, 1-EN), with median time to relapse 18.5 months (0.43-62). Seven of 14 tumors treated to a lower dose relapsed (1 SHH; 6 NWNS); only 1 (NWNS) of 4 patients with higher divergent dose relapsed. Six of 18 patients treated to similar dose relapsed; all were NWNS, and 4/6 had M3 disease. Eleven of 14 patients who relapsed died. CONCLUSION: Molecular subtyping may help avoid under-treating some NWNS tumors but innovative strategies for metastatic NWNS are needed. We confirm that histological subtypes may hold some predictive value as 5/7 LC/A relapsed and no desmoplastic tumors relapsed. In this small sample, no WNT relapse occurred and only 1 SHH relapsed, suggesting that dose de-escalation can be cautiously explored for these subtypes. Future research directions include applying an MRI image-based algorithm to subtype the entire cohort, and combining molecular data with other institutions to examine relapse patterns by subtype.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-Oncology→Same topicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→