Airway Hyperresponsiveness, Inflammation, and Subepithelial Collagen Deposition in Recently Diagnosed versus Long-standing Mild Asthma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aimed at documenting airway inflammation and subepithelial collagen deposition in patients using only inhaled beta(2)-agonists with either recently diagnosed asthma (RDA: </= 2 yr, n = 16) or long-standing asthma (LSA: >/= 13 yr, n = 16) and at the influence of an intense inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) treatment on these parameters, in relation to changes in airway responsiveness. Patients had a methacholine inhalation test and a bronchoscopy with bronchial biopsies before and after an 8-wk treatment with inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP), 1,000 microgram/day. Baseline FEV(1) (mean +/- SEM) was normal and similar in both groups (RDA: 98.1 +/- 2.7, LSA: 94.5 +/- 4.6%). Geometric mean methacholine PC(20) was lower in LSA than in RDA (0.44 versus 3.37 mg/ml) at baseline and improved similarly by 1.85 and 1.86 double concentrations with FP treatment. PC(20) normalized (>/= 16 mg/ml) in five patients with RDA and two patients with LSA. Baseline mean bronchial cell counts (per mm(2) connective tissue surface) for CD3(+), CD4(+), CD8(+), CD25(+), EG1(+), CD45ro(+), and AA1(+) cells were similar in both groups. With FP, EG1(+) (p < 0.001), EG2(+) (p = 0.018), and AA1(+) counts (p = 0.009) decreased significantly in both groups while CD45ro(+) (p = 0.02) counts decreased only in LSA. Baseline type 1 and type 3 collagen deposition underneath the basement membrane was similar in RDA and LSA and did not change significantly after FP. This study shows that recent compared to long-standing mild asthma is associated with a similar degree of airway inflammation and subepithelial fibrosis, and a similar improvement in airway hyperresponsiveness after 8 wk on high-dose ICS. It also indicates that once asthma becomes symptomatic, airway responsiveness cannot normalize in most subjects over such a time period, even with a high dose of ICS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".