MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2097524729 · doi:10.2174/156652310793180698

Retinal Blinding Disorders and Gene Therapy - Molecular and Clinical Aspects

2010· review· en· W2097524729 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Gene Therapy · 2010
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRetinal Development and Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRetinitis pigmentosaBlindingRetinal DisorderRetinal degenerationRetinaRetinalGenetic enhancementRetinal pigment epitheliumBiologyGene therapy of the human retinaMacular degenerationBioinformaticsGeneNeuroscienceMedicineGeneticsClinical trialOphthalmology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Retinal blinding disorders together have a prevalence of 1 in 2000 humans world wide and represent a significant impact on the quality of life as well as the possibility to attain personal achievements. Mutations in genes that are expressed either in RPE cells, photoreceptors or bipolar cells can cause varying forms of degenerative or stationary retinal disorders, as the presence of the encoded proteins is crucial for normal function, maintenance and synaptic interaction. The degree of damage caused by different mutations depends upon the type of mutation within the gene, resulting in either total absence or the presence of a non-functional or potentially toxic protein. Potential treatment strategies require the identification of the cell type, in which the mutated gene is expressed for later targeting by viral vector mediated gene transfer. In the first part of this review, the authors present different cellular pathways that take place either in the RPE, photoreceptors, or bipolar cells. Furthermore, the authors demonstrate why genetic and molecular testing methods, which clearly identify the disease causing mutations, are crucial for attaining the correct diagnosis in order to indentify patients suitable to be treated by upcoming new therapeutic methods. In the second part, a short clinical classification of the most important forms of retinal blinding disorders is given, together with clinical aspects concerning the problems that arise when facing low residual visual perception and the enormous heterogeneity of symptoms within these disorders. Keywords: Retina, LCA, EOSRD, retinitis pigmentosa, gene therapy, retinal degeneration, RPE, photoreceptors, Retinal blinding disorders, retinal pigment epithelium, apoptosis, adeno-associated viral (AAV) vec-tors, Leber congenital amaurosis, retinal dystrophy, RPE65 deficiency, phagocytosis, rhodopsin, congenital stationary night blindness, fundus albipunctatus, Bothnia dystrophy, Newfoundland rod-cone dys-trophy, MERTK, choroideremia, visual cycle, TYR, pink eye dilution gene, pigment epithelial growth factor, BEST1 gene, GNAT, RHOK, Bipolar Cell Signal-ing, Usher Syndrome, Bardet Biedl Syndrome, Missense Mutations, Null Mutations, Poly-morphisms, rod-cone dystrophies, cone-rod dystrophies, cone dystro-phies, uniparental isodisomy, non-Mendelian inheritance, Fundus autofluorescence, optical coherence tomography, electrooculo-gram, vitel-liforme macular dystrophy, autosomal dominant Vitreoretinochoroidopathy, auto-somal recessive Bestrophinopathy, funduscopy, fundus flavimaculatus, Stationary Cone Diseases/Achromatopsia, Stationary Rod Diseases/CSNB, Retinoschisis, Albinism

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.996
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it