Photon emission accompanying deformation and fracture of ice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We observed photon emission during deformation and fracture of axially loaded polycrystalline ice. Emission of visible photons (300650 nm) was correlated with crack generation and fracture, based on time-resolved photon emission signals taken during load changes. Emission intensity, including the entire spectra ranging from 300 to 650 nm, was roughly correlated with increasing strain energy released by fracturing, while considerable scattering of the intensity data implied that emission intensity also depended on the characteristics of each individual crack. Correlation was taken between simultaneous emissions detected with two photomultiplier tubes with different ranges of spectral sensitivity. Brief, intense emissions were clearly associated with load drops, and these probably included wavelengths shorter than 320 nm, indicating that near ultraviolet light is also emitted. On the other hand, weak but continuous signals with wavelengths longer than 650 nm were emitted the entire time the ice was subjected to a load. Emission intensity and spectra may be attributed to microprocesses during fracturing. Experimental evidence for emission of visible photons indicates that the generated electric charges on crack surfaces and at crack tips have energy ranging from 2 to 6 eV. PACS No.: 46.50
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".