MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Immunohistochemical Profile and Clinical-Pathological Variants of Breast Cancer in Northeastern Mexico

2013· article· en· W2097535930 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
José Manuel Ornelas-Aguirre, L. Pérez-Michel

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Analytical Oncology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBreast Cancer Treatment Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstituto Mexicano del Seguro Social
KeywordsImmunohistochemistryBreast cancerMedicineEstrogen receptorPathologicalProgesterone receptorInternal medicineOncologyBreast carcinomaLymph nodeCancerPathologyEtiologyEstrogen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Breast cancer is a heterogeneous illness, with subtypes of varying etiology. Estrogen Receptor (ER), Progesterone Receptor (PR) and HER2/neu (Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2) expressions have been identified as predicting factors. Objective: To demonstrate the possible association of the five immunohistochemical (IHC) expression profiles with clinical and histopathological variables of breast cancer in northeastern Mexico. Methodology: In 522 women with breast carcinoma, five IHC profiles were defined [Luminal A, Luminal B, Mixed, HER2/neu and Triple-negative (TN)]. An analysis was done to determine if there were differences between them in relation to the clinical and histopathological variables. Results: The distribution of the histological subtypes was: luminal A (32.97%), TN (27.53%), HER2/neu (19.02%), mixed (13.41%) and luminal B (7.07%). The average age at diagnosis was 53.07 ± 12.08 years, in 90.5% of the patients the size of the tumor was ≥ 2.0 cm, and 40.94% had lymph node involvement. Luminal A subtype had the highest percentage in the postmenopausal state (63.7%, p=0.071). Illness recurred in 21.01% of the patients (n=116), principally with the TN subtype (28.3%, p=0.012). Conclusions: This study detected the characterization of IHC subgroups in patients treated for breast cancer at a reference center for cancer treatment in northeastern Mexico.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.394

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Analytical OncologySame topicBreast Cancer Treatment StudiesFrench-language works237,207