Characterization of Extradiol Dioxygenases from a Polychlorinated Biphenyl-Degrading Strain That Possess Higher Specificities for Chlorinated Metabolites
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent studies demonstrated that 2,3-dihydroxybiphenyl 1,2-dioxygenase from Burkholderia sp. strain LB400 (DHBDLB400; EC 1.13.11.39) cleaves chlorinated 2,3-dihydroxybiphenyls (DHBs) less specifically than unchlorinated DHB and is competitively inhibited by 2',6'-dichloro-2,3-dihydroxybiphenyl (2',6'-diCl DHB). To determine whether these are general characteristics of DHBDs, we characterized DHBDP6-I and DHBDP6-III, two evolutionarily divergent isozymes from Rhodococcus globerulus strain P6, another good polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) degrader. In contrast to DHBDLB400, both rhodococcal enzymes had higher specificities for some chlorinated DHBs in air-saturated buffer. Thus, DHBDP6-I cleaved the DHBs in the following order of specificity: 6-Cl DHB > 3'-Cl DHB approximately DHB approximately 4'-Cl DHB > 2'-Cl DHB > 4-Cl DHB > 5-Cl DHB. It also cleaved its preferred substrate, 6-Cl DHB, three times more specifically than DHB. Interestingly, some of the worst substrates for DHBDP6-I were among the best for DHBDP6-III (4-Cl DHB > 5-Cl DHB approximately 6-Cl DHB approximately 3'-Cl DHB > DHB > 2'-Cl DHB approximately 4'-Cl DHB; DHBDP6-III cleaved 4-Cl DHB two times more specifically than DHB). Generally, each of the monochlorinated DHBs inactivated the enzymes more rapidly than DHB. The exceptions were 4-Cl DHB for DHBDP6-I and 2'-Cl DHB for DHBDP6-III. As observed in DHBDLB400, chloro substituents influenced the reactivity of the dioxygenases with O2. For example, the apparent specificities of DHBDP6-I and DHBDP6-III for O2 in the presence of 2'-Cl DHB were lower than those in the presence of DHB by factors of >60 and 4, respectively. DHBDP6-I and DHBDP6-III shared the relative inability of DHBDLB400 to cleave 2',6'-diCl DHB (apparent catalytic constants of 0.088 +/- 0.004 and 0.069 +/- 0.002 s(-1), respectively). However, these isozymes had remarkably different apparent K(m) values for this compound (0.007 +/- 0.001, 0.14 +/- 0.01, and 3.9 +/- 0.4 micro M for DHBDLB400, DHBDP6-I, and DHBDP6-III, respectively). The markedly different reactivities of DHBDP6-I and DHBDP6-III with chlorinated DHBs undoubtedly contribute to the PCB-degrading activity of R. globerulus P6.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".