MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Near real-time simulations of global CMT earthquakes

2010· article· en· W2097606516 on OpenAlexaff
Jeroen Tromp, Dimitri Komatitsch, Vala Hjörleifsdóttir, Qinya Liu, Hejun Zhu, Daniel Peter, E. Bozdağ, Dennis McRitchie, P. A. Friberg, Chad Trabant, Alex Hutko

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Journal International · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicearthquake and tectonic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeismogramGeologySeismologySeismometerSlownessGeodesy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have developed a near real-time system for the simulation of global earthquakes.Prompted by a trigger from the Global Centroid Moment Tensor (CMT) Project, the system automatically calculates normal-mode synthetic seismograms for the Preliminary Reference Earth Model, and spectral-element synthetic seismograms for 3-D mantle model S362ANI in combination with crustal model Crust2.0.The 1-D and 3-D synthetics for more than 1800 seismographic stations operated by members of the international Federation of Digital Seismograph Networks are made available via the internet (global.shakemovie.princeton.edu) and the Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology Data Management Center (IRIS; iris.edu).The record length of the synthetics is 100 min for CMT events with magnitudes less than 7.5, capturing R1 and G1 at all epicentral distances, and 200 min for CMT events with magnitudes equal to or greater than 7.5, capturing R2 and G2.The mode simulations are accurate at periods of 8 s and longer, whereas the spectral-element simulations are accurate between periods from 17 to 500 s.The spectral-element software incorporates a number of recent improvements, for example, the mesh honours the Moho as a first-order discontinuity underneath the oceans and continents, and the performance of the solver is enhanced by reducing processor cache misses and optimizing matrix-matrix multiplication.In addition to synthetic seismograms, the system produces a number of earthquake animations, as well as various record sections comparing simulated and observed seismograms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations73
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Journal InternationalSame topicearthquake and tectonic studiesFrench-language works237,207