Women at altitude: forearm hemodynamics during acclimatization to 4,300 m with α<sub>1</sub>-adrenergic blockade
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We hypothesized that blockade of alpha(1)-adrenergic receptors would prevent the rise in peripheral vascular resistance that normally occurs during acclimatization. Sixteen eumenorrheic women were studied at sea level (SL) and at 4,300 m (days 3 and 10). Volunteers were randomly assigned to take the selective alpha(1)-blocker prazosin or placebo. Venous compliance, forearm vascular resistance, and blood flow were measured using plethysmography. Venous compliance fell by day 3 in all subjects (1.39 +/- 0.30 vs. 1.62 +/- 0.43 ml. Delta 30 mmHg(-1) x 100 ml tissue(-1) x min(-1) at SL, means +/- SD). Altitude interacted with prazosin treatment (P < 0.0001) such that compliance returned to SL values by day 10 in the prazosin-treated group (1.68 +/- 0.19) but not in the placebo-treated group (1.20 +/- 0.10, P < 0.05). By day 3 at 4,300 m, all women had significant falls in resistance (35.2 +/- 13.2 vs. 54.5 +/- 16.1 mmHg x ml(-1) x min(-1) at SL) and rises in blood flow (2.5 +/- 1.0 vs. 1.6 +/- 0.5 ml. 100 ml tissue(-1) x min(-1) at SL). By day 10, resistance and flow returned toward SL, but this return was less in the prazosin-treated group (resistance: 39.8 +/- 4.6 mmHg x ml(-1) x min(-1) with prazosin vs. 58.5 +/- 9.8 mmHg x ml(-1) x min(-1) with placebo; flow: 1.9 +/- 0.7 ml. 100 ml tissue(-1) x min(-1) with prazosin vs. 2.3 +/- 0.3 ml x 100 ml tissue(-1) x min(-1) with placebo, P < 0.05). Lower resistance related to higher circulating epinephrine in both groups (r = -0.50, P < 0.0001). Higher circulating norepinephrine related to lower venous compliance in the placebo-treated group (r = -0.42, P < 0.05). We conclude that alpha(1)-adrenergic stimulation modulates peripheral vascular changes during acclimatization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".