MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2097653301 · doi:10.1109/igarss.1994.399715

Progress in the development of the CCRS along-track interferometer

2002· article· en· W2097653301 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
A.L. Gray, M.W.A. van der Kooij, K.E. Mattar, P.J. Farris-Manning

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSynthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterferometryAzimuthSensitivity (control systems)Remote sensingL bandGeologyC bandCoherence (philosophical gambling strategy)Noise (video)OpticsMode (computer interface)Track (disk drive)TerrainGeodesyPhysicsComputer scienceEngineeringGeographyElectronic engineeringImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The CCRS C-band SAR owned and operated by the Canada Centre for Remote Sensing (CCRS) was modified in 1991 to operate in an across-track C-band interferometric mode for derivation of terrain elevation. This mode has now been extended such that the two C-band receivers can be used with two separate, almost identical, antennas aligned in the along-track direction thereby creating a SAR capable of detecting and measuring target radial motion. Two new C(H) antennas have been mounted on the right-hand side of the Convair 580 to form the along-track C-band interferometer. The antennas share a common, rigid, mounting structure and the phase centres are separated by 0.5 m. The primary application for this mode will be in ocean monitoring R&D; SAR wave and wake imaging, measurement of coastal and ocean currents, estimation of pack-ice drift, detection of sub-surface sand waves through current modulation, etc. while the short baseline dictated by the existing radome leads to a relatively low sensitivity to radial motion, approximately 24/spl deg/ per m/s, the time between image formation at the same azimuth geometry is small (less than 2 ms) with respect to typical C-band ocean coherence times (around 50-100 ms). This, combined with a good signal-to-noise ratio, will allow relatively low phase noise on the interferometric products and therefore adequate sensitivity to radial motion for most situations. A description of the new system and of ground and airborne testing are given.>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSynthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and TechniquesFrench-language works237,207