MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2097658184 · doi:10.3906/kim-0809-33

Partial regeneration of Ni-based catalysts for hydrogen production via methane cracking part II: modeling and optimization

2009· article· en· W2097658184 on OpenAlexaff
Reyyan Koç, Erdoğan Alper, Eric Croiset, Ali Elkamel

Bibliographic record

VenueTURKISH JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicCatalysts for Methane Reforming
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryCatalysisMethaneCarbon monoxideChemical engineeringHydrogenReaction rate constantReaction rateThermodynamicsKineticsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High purity, carbon monoxide-free hydrogen and filamentous carbon can be produced by thermo-catalytic cracking of methane. Carbon filaments continue to grow until the catalyst deactivates because of carbon encapsulation. Regeneration of catalyst is important to maintain a continuous process. Our work on optimization of the partial regeneration method showed that activity of the catalyst can be sustained for longer times by gasifying not all but some extent of the deposited carbon. In the previous work, a kinetic model was developed to be able to understand the reaction mechanism of deactivation of fresh catalyst at the molecular level. The objective of this study was to develop a well-fitted kinetic model for deactivation of regenerated catalyst. A kinetic model that consists of surface reactions, filament formation, and deactivation was developed for the regenerated catalyst. It is assumed that reaction parameters at the molecular level do not change when the burn off degree is at a moderate extent but these parameters changed drastically when burn off degree is vastly increased or decreased. Rate constant for the encapsulation reaction is adjusted for the simulation results to be representative of the experimental results (typically specific weight of carbon (g C/g Ni) vs. time on stream). The system of differential algebraic equations consists of the steady-state equations for all surface intermediates, an algebraic equation of dissolution/segregation, diffusion equation, and the site balance equation. The system has been solved without assuming any rate-determining step or most abundant surface intermediates. Parameter estimation procedures were repeated for the deactivation cycles of regenerated 5 wt% Ni/\gamma-Al_2O_3 catalyst. The basic idea that underlies the model is that every carbon atom will diffuse through the nickel particle and participate in the formation of carbon filaments until the catalyst deactivates. Specific weight of carbon is calculated using the rate of carbon diffusion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.089
Threshold uncertainty score0.600

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTURKISH JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRYSame topicCatalysts for Methane ReformingFrench-language works237,207