MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2097659800 · doi:10.1212/wnl.56.10.1416

Fulminant liver failure during interferon beta treatment of multiple sclerosis

2001· article· en· W2097659800 on OpenAlexaffabout
Eric M. Yoshida, Simon Ladefoged Rasmussen, Urs P. Steinbrecher, S. Erb, Charles H. Scudamore, S. W. Chung, Joël Oger, S. A. Hashimoto

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Canadian institutionsVancouver Native Health Society
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAsymptomaticFulminantGastroenterologyInternal medicineMultiple sclerosisComa (optics)Fulminant hepatic failureLiver transplantationPediatricsImmunologyTransplantation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although interferon (IFN) β has many adverse effects, including flulike illness, increased spasticity, and laboratory abnormalities,1 autoimmune events are usually limited to autoantibodies with the thyroid the most common target organ involved.2 Liver abnormalities during IFN β therapy are usually clinically asymptomatic and transient biochemical events.1,2⇓ We report a patient who developed acute fulminant liver failure a few weeks after the initiation of IFN β and required an emergency liver transplant. Fulminant failure as a result of IFN β is not well reported in the MS literature and this is the first patient reported who required a liver transplant as a result of MS therapy. A 59-year-old Caucasian woman was transferred to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) in hepatic coma and hepatorenal syndrome 7 weeks after starting interferon β-1a (Rebif, Serono-Canada, Oakville, Ontario, Canada). One year previously, she developed diplopia and ataxia. An MRI scan disclosed small deep white matter …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.416
Threshold uncertainty score0.583

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations62
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurologySame topicMultiple Sclerosis Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207