MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2097669568 · doi:10.2980/18-1-3397

Achene buoyancy and germinability of the terrestrial invasive <i>Fallopia</i> × <i>bohemica</i> in aquatic environment: A new vector of dispersion?

2011· article· en· W2097669568 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Soraya Rouifed, Sara Puijalon, Marie-Rose Viricel, Florence Piola

Bibliographic record

VenueEcoscience · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLichen and fungal ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAgence de l'eau Loire-Bretagne
KeywordsAcheneSeedlingGerminationBiologyBiological dispersalSowingBotanyRecalcitrant seedHorticulture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Seed dispersal along watercourses can favour the long-distance migration of invasive species, not only for aquatic or wetland species, but also for terrestrial wind-dispersed plants. It is crucial to investigate the role of watercourses in the dispersal of the knotweed hybrid complex (Fallopia × bohemica) due to its frequent occurrence on riverbanks and production of fertile achenes. For this purpose, we experimentally studied buoyancy and germinability of F. × bohemica achenes in stirred water, over 28 d. We also measured the long-term survival and growth of seedlings according to exposure time to water. After nearly 2 d in the water, 50% of achenes were still afloat. After 3 d, germination occurred in water and the seedlings also floated. Moreover, the exposure of achenes to water, for however long, significantly favoured their germination rate, without affecting seedling survival, compared to a direct planting in soil. Furthermore, a maximum seedling dry mass was reached following exposure to water for 277 h (11.5 d), surpassing significantly the dry mass of seedlings planted directly in soil. Water exposure strongly favours achene germination and seedling survival. Our results demonstrate a high potential for the seeds and seedlings of Fallopia to be dispersed successfully by water.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.394
Threshold uncertainty score0.190

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEcoscienceSame topicLichen and fungal ecologyFrench-language works237,207