Novel Strategy for Temporary Decompression of the Lower Urinary Tract in Neonates Using a Ureteral Stent
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: In children with congenital obstructive uropathy, including posterior urethral valves, lower urinary tract decompression is recommended pending definitive surgical intervention. Current options, which are limited to a feeding tube or Foley catheter, pose unappreciated constraints in luminal diameter and are associated with potential problems. We assess the impact of luminal diameter on the current draining options and present a novel alternative method, repurposing a widely available stent that optimizes drainage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed with posterior urethral valves between January 2013 and December 2014. In all patients a 6Fr 12 cm Double-J ureteral stent was advanced over a guidewire in a retrograde fashion into the bladder. Luminal flow and cross-sectional areas were also assessed for each of 3 tubes for urinary drainage, ie 6Fr Double-J stent, 5Fr feeding tube and 6Fr Foley catheter. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients underwent uneventful bedside Double-J stent placement. Mean ± SD age at valve ablation was 28.5 ± 16.6 days. Mean ± SD peak serum creatinine was 2.23 ± 0.97 mg/dl after birth and 0.56 ± 0.22 mg/dl at the procedure. Urine output after stent placement was excellent in all patients. The Foley catheter and feeding tube drained approximately 18 and 6 times more slowly, respectively, and exhibited half the calculated cross-sectional luminal area compared to the Double-J stent. CONCLUSIONS: Use of Double-J stents in neonates with posterior urethral valves is a safe and effective alternative method for lower urinary tract decompression that optimizes the flow/lumen relationship compared to conventional drainage options.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".