MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2097749865 · doi:10.1016/j.sjopt.2014.03.002

Three dimensional MRI study: Safety of short versus long needle peribulbar anesthesia

2014· article· en· W2097749865 on OpenAlexaff
Sahar M. Elkhamary, Waleed Riad

Bibliographic record

VenueSaudi Journal of Ophthalmology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntraocular Surgery and Lenses
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMagnetic resonance imagingOrbit (dynamics)AnatomyQuadrant (abdomen)Statistical significanceStatistical analysisNuclear medicineRadiologySurgeryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The standard technique of Peribulbar block is to use 25 g 25 mm needle at the junction between the lateral one third and medial two third of the lower orbital rim in the infero-temporal quadrant of the orbit. Theoretically, insertion of longer needles increases the potential of injury to important structure; however, safety of the shorter needle had never been demonstrated. This study describes the anatomy of the orbital structures with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using the three-dimensional constructive interference in steady state (3D CISS) sequence to present a morphological basis for needle entry at 12.5 and 25 mm lengths. Statistical comparisons were performed at the 12.5 versus 25 mm depths. Statistical significance was indicated by P < 0.05. METHOD: Fifty patients free of orbital pathology with normal axial length were selected for MRI with the 3D CISS sequence. Original axial and multiplanar image reconstruction (MPR) images were selected for image interpretation. Orbital structures were identified at 12.5 and 25 mm depths from the orbital rim to compare significant differences in anatomy between the two imaging planes at the expected needle depth and to assess the size of the globe and the orbit. RESULTS: The cross sectional area of the extraocular muscles were statistically significantly smaller at the 12.5 mm plane (P = 0.001). The area of inferotemporal fat was statistically significantly larger at the 12.5 mm plane (P = 0.033). There was no statistical difference in the inferonasal and superonasal fat areas at different depths (P = 0.34, P = 0.35 respectively). The size of the orbit and globe was significantly larger at 12.5 mm (P = 0.001). There was no difference between depths in the presence or absence of neurovascular bundles and supporting structures including the intramuscular septae. CONCLUSION: There is a larger structure-free space at a depth of 12.5 mm than at 25 mm. Therefore, the inference is that a needle inserted in the infero-temporal zone to a depth of 12.5 mm is less likely to injure the eyeball or extra-ocular muscles than one advanced to 25 mm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.097
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSaudi Journal of OphthalmologySame topicIntraocular Surgery and LensesFrench-language works237,207