Intragastric immunization of mice with enterohemorrhagic<i>Escherichia coli</i>O157:H7 bacterial ghosts reduces mortality and shedding and induces a Th2-type dominated mixed immune response
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A bacterial ghost (BG)-based vaccine was developed against enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the protective effect of E. coli O157:H7 BGs in a mouse model and to reveal the mechanism of the immune response. Booster immunization provided a higher protection rate (84%) than single-dose immunization (56%). Intragastric immunization of E. coli O157:H7 BGs induced both humoral and cellular immune responses. The proliferative response of CD4+ T cells was mediated by the antigen-presenting cells. The humoral immune response dominated the immune response, while the cellular immune response developed later. Inflammatory reaction was balanced by the mixed Th1/Th2 immune response. The immune sera anti-adhesion effect was confirmed by the inhibition effect, which could inhibit >90% of the adhesion of E. coli O157:H7 to Hep-2 target cells in vitro. Antibody titer specific for intimin, a molecule important for adhesion of E. coli O157:H7 to target cells, correlated with specific immunoglobulin A or G antibody titer. Therefore, it might be feasible to clinically test BG vaccines in the future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".