MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2097858264 · doi:10.1109/jlt.2009.2028247

Characterization of Subpicosecond Pulses Based on Temporal Interferometry With Real-Time Tracking of Higher Order Dispersion and Optical Time Delay

2009· article· en· W2097858264 on OpenAlexaff
Haiyun Xia, Jianping Yao

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Lightwave Technology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Fiber Laser Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpticsInterferometryDispersion (optics)ChirpGroup delay dispersionPhysicsTime domainPulse (music)Astronomical interferometerGroup delay and phase delayInterference (communication)Computer scienceOptical fiberTelecommunicationsLaserDispersion-shifted fiber

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the complete reconstruction of ultrashort optical pulses based on temporal interferometry, the chromatic dispersion and the optical time delay are two key factors, which determine the measurement accuracy. Due to the higher order dispersion, the wavelength-to-time mapping becomes nonlinear, leading to a nonuniformly spaced interference pattern and a decreased fringe visibility in the time domain, even though the input pulse is transform limited. On the other hand, an estimation of the time delay difference with a minor deviation from the true value will result in an artificial linear chirp in the reconstructed phase of the pulse under test. In this paper, a rigorous mathematical analysis on the nonlinear frequency-to-time mapping is performed, with which the phenomena of a nonuniformly spaced interference pattern and a decreased fringe visibility are explained. A frequency-to-time mapping function including higher order dispersion is developed. With a general mapping function, using a transform-limited pulse as the reference signal, we propose a method for real-time tracking of the system parameters, including the chromatic dispersion corresponding to all the optical devices incorporated in the system and the time delay introduced by the interferometer. Finally, a complete reconstruction of a 237 fs optical pulse is demonstrated experimentally with an average angular error of 0.18 rad ranging from 190.65 to 193.85 THz.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.488

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Lightwave TechnologySame topicAdvanced Fiber Laser TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207