MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2097883826 · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2009.2017258

Crossover Digital Predistorter for the Compensation of Crosstalk and Nonlinearity in MIMO Transmitters

2009· article· en· W2097883826 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Power Amplifier Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPredistortionAdjacent channel power ratioMIMOElectronic engineeringTransmitterComputer scienceWidebandAmplifierAdjacent channelNonlinear systemAlgorithmTelecommunicationsEngineeringChannel (broadcasting)PhysicsCMOS

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a novel crossover digital predistorter (CO-DPD) model to compensate for crosstalk and nonlinearity in multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) radio systems. Crosstalk can take place before or after the power amplifiers, designated herein as nonlinear and linear crosstalk, respectively. This paper demonstrates that, contrary to linear crosstalk, nonlinear crosstalk significantly affects the performance of the digital predistortion algorithm; and, it cannot be embedded and compensated for by the conventional channel matrix inversion algorithm at the receiver side of MIMO links. Based on a parametric study of system-level simulations and measurements, it was found that for a -20-dB nonlinear crosstalk level, the use of a memory multibranch polynomial predistorter, along with the channel matrix inversion algorithm, bounds the adjacent channel power ratio (ACPR) for a wideband code division multiple access (WCDMA) signal to -46 dBc and the error vector magnitude (EVM) for a world interoperability for microwave access (WiMAX) signal to -43 dB in MIMO links. The proposed CO-DPD was investigated and analyzed for the MIMO transmitter with <i xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">N</i> = 2, where <i xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">N</i> is the number of RF front-ends. Its performance was evaluated through measurements, the experimental results obtained show that, in the presence of -20-dB nonlinear crosstalk, the proposed CO-DPD improve the ACPR of the WCDMA signal by 13 dB to -56.81 dBc from those obtained using a conventional digital predistorter. The same improvement was observed in the EVM measurement of the WiMAX signal, where the EVM decreases from -21.22 dB for the conventional DPD to -49.71 dB for the proposed CO-DPD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.860
Threshold uncertainty score0.412

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it