Functional receptor‐channel coupling compared in contractile and proliferative human vascular smooth muscle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have previously identified a human vascular smooth muscle clone that can reversibly convert between proliferative and contractile phenotypes. Here we compared receptor-channel coupling in these cells using fura-2 to monitor [Ca(2+)](i) and patch-clamp to record currents. Histamine elevated [Ca(2+)](i) in all cells and caused contraction of cells exhibiting the contractile phenotype. The rise of [Ca(2+)](i) persisted in Ca(2+)-free solution and was abolished by thapsigargin, indicating involvement of stores. Whole cell electrophysiological recording revealed that histamine evoked transient outward K(+) current, indicating functional receptor-channel coupling. The time-course and amplitude of the histamine-activated current were similar in cells of the proliferative and contractile phenotypes. Moreover, a large conductance K(+) channel was recorded in cell-attached patches and was activated by histamine as well as the Ca(2+) ionophore A-23187, identifying it as the large conductance Ca(2+)-dependent K(+) channel. This K(+) channel showed similar characteristics and activation in both proliferative and contractile phenotypes, indicating that expression was independent of phenotype. In contrast, histamine also elicited an inward Cl(-) current in some contractile cells, suggesting differential regulation of this current depending on phenotype. These studies demonstrate the usefulness of this human vascular cell clone for studying functional plasticity of smooth muscle, while avoiding complications arising from extended times in culture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".