Regulation of c-Ret in the developing kidney is responsive to Pax2 gene dosage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During kidney development, Pax2 and Pax8 are expressed very early in the mammalian nephric duct and both precede the expression of receptor tyrosine kinase, c-Ret. However, in Pax2-/- mutant mice, expression of c-Ret is lost after embryonic day 10.5. As the Ret/Gdnf pathway is necessary for renal development and there is a temporal and spatial relationship of Pax2 and c-Ret expression in the developing genito-urinary system, we postulate that Pax2 is necessary for c-Ret expression in the developing kidney. In vitro, Pax2 protein is capable of physically interacting with a c-RET promoter, and both Pax2 and Pax8 can activate the expression of a reporter gene driven by the c-RET promoter. Compound heterozygous null mice (Pax2+/-: Ret+/-) display an increased incidence of unilateral and bilateral renal agenesis, and smaller kidneys with fewer nephrons. Furthermore, the expression of Gdnf is reduced 2-3-fold, whereas c-Ret expression is reduced 9-47-fold in Pax2 heterozygous embryonic kidneys as detected by real-time quantitative RT (QRT)-PCR. The data demonstrate that Pax2 plays an integral role in the initiation and maintenance of the Ret/Gdnf pathway by not only activating the ligand of the pathway, but by also enhancing the expression of the pathway receptor Ret. The effects of reduced Pax2 gene dosage are thus amplified resulting in a haploinsufficient phenotype.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".