MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2097969864 · doi:10.1139/x03-027

Patterns of canopy interception and throughfall along a topographic sequence for black spruce dominated forest ecosystems in northwestern Ontario

2003· article· en· W2097969864 on OpenAlexfundvenueaboutno aff
Dave Morris, Alan G. Gordon, Andrew M. Gordon

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Forest Research · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPlant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistry of Natural Resources
KeywordsThroughfallBlack spruceCanopyInterceptionEnvironmental scienceKjeldahl methodForest floorHydrology (agriculture)NutrientNitrogenChemistryAgronomySoil waterTaigaBotanyEcologySoil scienceGeologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 3-year (1993–1995) study was conducted to describe both the spatial (within- and between-site) and temporal (monthly) patterns associated with canopy interception, throughfall, and net forest water along a black spruce (Picea mariana (Mill.) BSP) topo-sequence situated in northwestern Ontario. This site array included (1) an upland, well-drained, mineral soil site; (2) a poorly drained, midslope, wet mineral site; and (3) a treed wetland on organic (peat) soil. Bulk precipitation (BP) and throughfall (TF) were collected, on an event basis (63 events, over 4800 samples analyzed), using standard collecting devices and analyzed for total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN), ammonium (NH4+), nitrate (NO3–), total phosphorus (TP), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), and magnesium (Mg). Comparison of BP and TF data suggested that an enrichment of K (190%), Mg (115%), and Ca (70%) occurred during canopy interactions. On the other hand, inorganic nitrogen (NH4+: –73%; NO3–: –47%), and to a lesser extent TP (–35%), rates declined. TKN, however, remained the same, suggesting that inorganic N reductions were offset by organic N inputs. Downward shifts in pH were also detected for TF (4.45–4.48), as compared with the pH of BP (4.52–4.80). Although all study sites received similar rainfall amounts, the more productive sites (i.e., carrying greater foliar mass, higher leaf area index) had lower TF volumes (i.e., higher interception rates) but higher macronutrient returns to the forest floor. This increase in macronutrient deposition was directly related to substantial increases in nutrient concentrations, which, in turn, suggested a greater degree of canopy interaction and (or) leaching on these sites. Throughfall pH, however, was not significantly different across the three study sites. With respect to temporal patterns, the major cations (K+, Ca2+, Mg2+) demonstrated an increasing trend in concentration levels in TF as the season progressed to a maximum in October. TKN and TP concentrations, on the other hand, maintained relatively stable levels throughout the summer, peaking in September, but dropping substantially in October as metabolic processes slowed and the supply of these nutrients to the foliage was reduced. Even with the increase in base cation concentration, throughfall pH shifted downward to 4.3 or below by late fall.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.134

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2003
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Forest ResearchSame topicPlant Water Relations and Carbon DynamicsFrench-language works237,207