Response of symptoms and synovitis to intra-muscular methylprednisolone in osteoarthritis of the hand: an ultrasonographic study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between ultrasound (US)-detected synovial pathology in hand OA and the clinical response to parenteral corticosteroids. METHODS: People with symptomatic OA of the hand completed questionnaires [visual analogue scale (VAS) pain, Australian Canadian Osteoarthritis Hand Index and VAS global] and underwent an US examination of both hands prior to receiving an i.m. dose of methylprednisolone. Four- and twelve-week assessments were performed to assess therapeutic response. RESULTS: Thirty-six subjects with established OA were enrolled. Twenty-four (67%) subjects met the primary end-point of a 20% reduction in VAS pain, 25 (69.4%) met the Osteoarthritis Research Society International response criteria at 4 weeks. Overall in the group, there was a reduction in levels of pain in the most painful joint, pain in all joints and in global disease activity at 4 weeks (P < 0.001, P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). Reduction in symptoms was not associated with a statistically significant reduction in US-detected synovial hypertrophy or power Doppler signal. CONCLUSIONS: In this observational study, parenteral corticosteroids were associated with a statistically significant reduction in symptoms, but no statistically significant reduction in US-detected synovial inflammation. The latter finding may, however, reflect the relatively low levels of synovial inflammation detected ultrasonagraphically in hand joints.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".