Effect of Different Dietary Methionine Sources on Intestinal Microbial Populations in Broiler Chickens
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two experiments were conducted to study the effect of various levels of DL-Met or 2-hydroxy-4-methylthiobutanoic acid (MHA-FA) on Clostridium perfringens and other intestinal bacteria in broiler chickens. In each experiment, 2 cages of 6 birds (14 d posthatch) were assigned to 1 of 7 different diets in a 2 x 4 factorial arrangement. The main effects were Met source (either DL-Met or MHA-FA) and Met level (0, 0.2, 0.4, or 0.8% dl-Met or 0, 0.227, 0.454, and 0.908% MHA-FA, thus providing 4 corresponding equimolar levels of each Met source). All birds were orally gavaged with a C. perfringens type A broth culture on d 1 and on d 14 to 20 and killed on d 28. Intestinal populations of C. perfringens, lactobacilli, Streptococcus group D, and coliforms were enumerated in the ileum and cecum, and necrotic enteritis intestinal lesions were scored. There was a significant reduction (P < 0.05) in C. perfringens populations in birds fed either Met source in the cecum (experiment 1) or the ileum and cecum (experiment 2). In experiment 2, the lactobacillus populations were significantly higher (P < 0.05) in the ceca of birds receiving 0.8% Met than in the birds given diets with the other levels of Met tested. Significantly lower populations (P < 0.05) of coliforms and Streptococcus group D were enumerated in the ileum of birds fed the 0.8% Met-supplemented diet than in the other dietary treatments. The effect of Met source on intestinal bacteria was not significant, suggesting that both DL-Met and MHA-FA have similar antibacterial properties. Last, there were no significant differences in intestinal lesion scores or the performance of birds fed different Met sources and concentrations. The results suggest that both DL-Met and MHA-FA may reduce intestinal populations of C. perfringens in broiler chickens when used in relatively high concentrations, and may reduce the risk of necrotic enteritis. Thus, feeding low-protein diets supplemented with crystalline amino acids might be beneficial in terms of the growth of various enteric pathogens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".