MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2098053958 · doi:10.3382/ps.2007-00133

Effect of Different Dietary Methionine Sources on Intestinal Microbial Populations in Broiler Chickens

2007· article· en· W2098053958 on OpenAlexafffund
J.P. Dahiya, D. Hoehler, Andrew G. Van Kessel, Murray D. Drew

Bibliographic record

VenuePoultry Science · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Chung-Hsing University
KeywordsClostridium perfringensCecumBroilerIleumLactobacillusBiologyMethionineFecesClostridiumStreptococcusEnterococcusMicrobiologyFood scienceAnimal scienceBacteriaAntibioticsBiochemistryFermentationAmino acid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two experiments were conducted to study the effect of various levels of DL-Met or 2-hydroxy-4-methylthiobutanoic acid (MHA-FA) on Clostridium perfringens and other intestinal bacteria in broiler chickens. In each experiment, 2 cages of 6 birds (14 d posthatch) were assigned to 1 of 7 different diets in a 2 x 4 factorial arrangement. The main effects were Met source (either DL-Met or MHA-FA) and Met level (0, 0.2, 0.4, or 0.8% dl-Met or 0, 0.227, 0.454, and 0.908% MHA-FA, thus providing 4 corresponding equimolar levels of each Met source). All birds were orally gavaged with a C. perfringens type A broth culture on d 1 and on d 14 to 20 and killed on d 28. Intestinal populations of C. perfringens, lactobacilli, Streptococcus group D, and coliforms were enumerated in the ileum and cecum, and necrotic enteritis intestinal lesions were scored. There was a significant reduction (P < 0.05) in C. perfringens populations in birds fed either Met source in the cecum (experiment 1) or the ileum and cecum (experiment 2). In experiment 2, the lactobacillus populations were significantly higher (P < 0.05) in the ceca of birds receiving 0.8% Met than in the birds given diets with the other levels of Met tested. Significantly lower populations (P < 0.05) of coliforms and Streptococcus group D were enumerated in the ileum of birds fed the 0.8% Met-supplemented diet than in the other dietary treatments. The effect of Met source on intestinal bacteria was not significant, suggesting that both DL-Met and MHA-FA have similar antibacterial properties. Last, there were no significant differences in intestinal lesion scores or the performance of birds fed different Met sources and concentrations. The results suggest that both DL-Met and MHA-FA may reduce intestinal populations of C. perfringens in broiler chickens when used in relatively high concentrations, and may reduce the risk of necrotic enteritis. Thus, feeding low-protein diets supplemented with crystalline amino acids might be beneficial in terms of the growth of various enteric pathogens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.680
Threshold uncertainty score0.137

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePoultry ScienceSame topicAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207