Nucleocytoplasmic transit of human α<sub>1</sub>‐antichymotrypsin in tobacco leaf epidermal cells†
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recently, we have observed a nuclear localization for human alpha(1)-antichymotrypsin (AACT) expressed in the cytosol of transgenic Bright Yellow-2 (BY-2) tobacco cultured cells (see accompanying paper: Benchabane, M., Saint-Jore-Dupas, C., Bardor, M., Faye, L., Michaud, D. and Gomord, V. (2008a) Targeting and post-translational processing of human alpha(1)-antichymotrypsin in BY-2 tobacco cultured cells. Plant Biotechnol. J. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2008.00382.x). In the present article, we assess whether the intrinsic DNA-binding activity of AACT can explain its nuclear localization, and whether this same activity has an impact on its protease inhibitory potency and stability in planta. An engineered form of AACT with no DNA-binding activity, rAACTDeltaK, was compared with the wild-type polypeptide, rAACT, in terms of chymotrypsin inhibitory potency, stability in planta and distribution in tobacco cells. In accordance with available data reporting distinct sites for protease inhibition and DNA binding, rAACT and rAACTDeltaK showed similar antichymotrypsin activity, similar to the activity of native AACT purified from human plasma. As observed for AACT in BY-2 tobacco cells, a green fluorescent protein (GFP)-AACT fusion transiently expressed in the cytosol of tobacco leaf epidermal cells was detected mainly in the nucleus by confocal laser microscopy. By contrast, rAACTDeltaK expressed as a GFP fusion showed a balanced distribution between the cytosol and the nucleus, similar to the distribution pattern of free GFP exhibiting no DNA-binding affinity. In line with immunodetection data showing higher accumulation levels for GFP-AACT in tobacco leaf cells, rAACTDeltaK was more susceptible than rAACT to tryptic digestion in the presence of DNA. Overall, these observations suggest the following: (i) a retention effect of DNA on AACT in the nucleus; and (ii) a stabilizing effect of the AACT-DNA interaction on rAACT challenged with non-target proteases, which, possibly, may be useful in protecting this protein in plant expression platforms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".