MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2098119904 · doi:10.1667/rr2381.1

DNA Damage Induced by Low-Energy Electrons: Conversion of Thymine to 5,6-Dihydrothymine in the Oligonucleotide Trimer TpTpT

2010· article· en· W2098119904 on OpenAlexafffund
Yeunsoo Park, Zejun Li, Pierre Cloutier, Léon Sanche, J. Richard Wagner

Bibliographic record

VenueRadiation Research · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Molecular Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsThymineChemistryOligonucleotideDNAPhosphodiester bondDNA damageTrimerBond cleavageStereochemistryBiochemistryRNAOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Low-energy electrons (LEE) induce single- and double-strand breaks in DNA. To investigate the mechanism of LEE-induced DNA damage, nucleotides and short oligonucleotide were irradiated with monoenergetic electrons in the solid state and the modifications were observed by chemical analyses. With 10 eV electrons and TpTpT as the target, approximately one-third of the total damage of TpTpT involves cleavage of the phosphodiester-sugar bond (C-O) and the N-glycosidic bond (C-N). Here we focus on the remaining two-thirds of the damage. The major products were observed to elute between TpT and TpTpT on the HPLC chromatogram. Of these products, three modifications were identified as XpTpT, TpXpT and TpTpX, where X = 5,6-dihydrothymine, on the basis of comparison with standard compounds using HPLC and mass spectrometry. These results suggest that 5,6-dihydrothymine is a major product of the reaction of LEE with DNA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRadiation ResearchSame topicAtomic and Molecular PhysicsFrench-language works237,207