MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2098136609 · doi:10.1016/j.femsle.2004.03.047

The effect of NAG?thiazoline on morphology and surface hydrophobicity of Escherichia coli

2004· article· en· W2098136609 on OpenAlexafffund
Christopher M. Reid

Bibliographic record

VenueFEMS Microbiology Letters · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCarbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsThiazolineEscherichia coliLysisBiochemistryChemistryLytic cycleBiosynthesisYield (engineering)EnzymeBiologyStereochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The beta-hexosaminidase inhibitor and structural analog of the putative oxazolium reaction intermediate of lytic transglycosylases, N-acetylglucosamine thiazoline (NAG-thiazoline), was synthesized in 46% overall yield and tested as an inhibitor of Escherichia coli growth. NAG-thiazoline, at concentrations up to 1 mg/ml, was not found to affect the viability of E. coli DH5alpha. However, the compound did induce morphological changes to the cells. Growth of cells in the presence of NAG-thiazoline caused an apparent inhibition of the biosynthesis of the cylindrical regions of the cells such that they became much shorter in length. The surface of these shorter cells was found to be much less hydrophobic compared to untreated cells as determined by the bacterial adhesion to hydrocarbon (BATH) assay. In addition, the co-administration of NAG-thiazoline with 1.7 x MIC concentrations of ampicillin prevented cell lysis suggesting that the compound inhibited autolytic enzymes, in particular the lytic transglycosylases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.597

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFEMS Microbiology LettersSame topicCarbohydrate Chemistry and SynthesisFrench-language works237,207