Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this paper, we discuss the Fermi‐level pinning issue on InN grown surfaces, in particular the nonpolar m ‐planes. Detailed angle‐resolved X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy studies show that for intrinsic InN nanowires the Fermi‐level on the nonpolar grown surfaces is located 0.1 to 0.2 eV below the conduction band edge, i.e., not pinned in the conduction band. This indicates that the commonly measured Fermi‐level pinning in the conduction band on nonpolar grown surfaces is not an intrinsic property of InN. Furthermore, our studies also suggest that surface states are positioned near the band edge and therefore do not contribute to the Fermi‐level pinning. This is consistent with recent theoretical and experimental studies. In the end, with the absence of the Fermi‐level pinning in the conduction band and surface electron accumulation, the unique electrical and optical properties of intrinsic InN nanowires are discussed, and compared with previously reported InN epilayers and n ‐type InN nanowires. (© 2014 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".