Conceptual Design of a Bipolar Kicker Magnet for the J-PARC-Kamioka Neutrino Project
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Japanese Hadron Facility (J-PARC) includes a ring in which the beam is accelerated from an energy of 3 GeV to 50 GeV. One of the proposed experiments, which require the beam to be extracted from this ring, is a long baseline neutrino oscillation experiment. Space constraints in the lattice of the ring result in a requirement for a novel bipolar combined function kicker that can be used for fast extraction or abort. Magnetic field pulses with a rise time of approximately 1.1/spl mu/s and 4.3/spl mu/s flat top duration are required. One of the stringent design requirements of the extraction system is a flat top ripple of less than /spl plusmn/1%. The proposed kicker system is composed of 6 kicker magnets of 1.5 m length each, powered by pulse forming lines (PFL's). To achieve the required kick angle of /spl plusmn/5.32 mrad a low characteristic impedance has been chosen. This paper discusses several different concepts for the kicker system and presents the results of investigations into options for system impedance, and kicker magnet type including transmission line, lumped inductance and hybrid-transmission line.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".