Plastid Regulation of<i>Lhcb1</i>Transcription in the Chlorophyte Alga<i>Dunaliella tertiolecta</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We identify four novel DNA-binding complexes in the nuclear-encoded Lhcb1 promoter of the chlorophyte alga Dunaliella tertiolecta that are regulated by photosynthetic pathways in the plastid. The binding activities of three of the complexes were positively correlated with time-dependent changes in Lhcb1 transcript abundance, implicating their roles as transcriptional enhancers in a retrograde signal transduction pathway. Using a combination of inhibitors, uncouplers, and antimycin A, and by following the kinetic pattern of gene regulation, we infer two different sensors in the signal transduction pathway. On short time scales of 0.5 to about 4 h, the transthylakoid membrane potential appears to be a critical determinant of gene expression, whereas on time scales of 8 h or longer, the redox state of the plastoquinone pool becomes increasingly more important. The differentiation of these two types of signals was observed in parallel effects on gene transcription and on the patterns of DNA-binding activities in the Lhcb1 promoter. These signals appear to be transduced at the nuclear level via a coordinated ensemble of DNA-binding complexes located between -367 and -188 bp from the start codon of the gene. The regulation of these elements allows the cell to up- or down-regulate the expression on Lhcb1 in response to changes in irradiance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".