MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2098408781 · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddl162

Variation in MLH1 distribution in recombination maps for individual chromosomes from human males

2006· article· en· W2098408781 on OpenAlexaff
Fei Sun

Bibliographic record

VenueHuman Molecular Genetics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicChromosomal and Genetic Variations
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyMeiosisSynaptonemal complexCentromereGeneticsHomologous recombinationChromosomeMLH1Homologous chromosomeChromosomal crossoverRecombinationPloidyEctopic recombinationGenetic recombinationGeneDNA mismatch repairDNA repair

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Meiotic recombination is essential for the segregation of homologous chromosomes and the formation of normal haploid gametes. Little is known about patterns of meiotic recombination in human germ cells or the mechanisms that control these patterns. Documentation of the normal range of variability of recombination distribution over the genome among individuals is an essential prerequisite for understanding abnormal recombination patterns, which may be associated with non-disjunction and chromosome rearrangements. In this article, variation in recombination maps for individual chromosomes among 10 normal human males is examined for the first time. An immunocytogenetic approach allowed analysis of pachytene cells, using antibodies to detect the mature synaptonemal complex (SCP1/SCP3), the centromere (CREST) and sites of crossing over (MLH1). Individual bivalents were identified with centromere-specific multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization. Significant heterogeneity in MLH1 focus frequency across donors was observed for larger chromosome arms (P<0.05, one-way ANOVA). Significant inter-donor variation in the overall crossover frequency per cell was also found (P<0.0001, one-way ANOVA). Furthermore, several chromosome arms showed significant differences in crossover distribution along the SCs among donors. Inter-individual variation in interference distances was observed for all chromosomes. The significance of altered recombination patterns among individuals and the role of interference are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.925
Threshold uncertainty score0.515

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations80
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHuman Molecular GeneticsSame topicChromosomal and Genetic VariationsFrench-language works237,207