MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2098491178 · doi:10.1196/annals.1302.033

Augmentation of Dilated Failing Left Ventricular Stroke Work by a Physiological Cardiac Assist Device

2004· review· en· W2098491178 on OpenAlexaff
Amir Landesberg, Eugene Konyukhov, Rona Shofti, YUVAL VAKNIN, Avshalom Shenhav, Leonid Livshitz, O. Lichtenstein, Carmit Levy, Rafael Beyar, S. Sideman, Israel Ohana, Henk E.D.J. ter Keurs, Giora Landesberg

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2004
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCardiologyMedicineVentricleInternal medicineStroke volumeCannulaEjection fractionHeart failureDiastoleDilated cardiomyopathyBlood pressureCardiac outputMitral regurgitationSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel physiological cardiac assist device (PCAD), otherwise known as the LEVRAM assist device, which is synchronized with the heartbeat, was developed to assist the left ventricle (LV) in chronic heart failure (CHF). The PCAD utilizes a single cannula, which is inserted in less than 15 s through the apex of the beating LV by means of a specially designed device. Blood is withdrawn from the LV into the PCAD in diastole and is injected back to the LV, through the same cannula, during the systolic ejection phase, thereby augmenting stroke volume (SV) and stroke work (SW). CHF with dilated LV was induced in sheep by successive intracoronary injections of 100-microm beads. The sheep (92.2 +/- 25.9 kg, n = 5) developed stable CHF with increased LV end-diastolic diameter (69.4 +/- 3.3 mm) and end-diastolic volume (LVEDV = 239 +/- 32 mL), with severely reduced ejection fraction (23.8 +/- 7.6%), as well as mild-to-moderate mitral regurgitation. The sheep were anesthetized, and the heart was exposed by left thoracotomy. Pressure was measured in the LV and aorta (Millar). The SV was measured by flow meters and the LV volume by sonocrystals. Assist was provided every 10 regular beats, and the assisted beats were compared with the preceding unassisted beats, at the same LVEDV. The PCAD displaced 13.6 +/- 3.4 mL, less than 8% of LVEDV. Added SW was calculated from the assisted and control pressure-volume loops. The efficiency, defined as an increase in SW divided by the mechanical work of the PCAD, was 85.4 +/- 16.9%. We conclude that the PCAD, working with a small displaced blood volume in synchrony with the heartbeat, efficiently augments the SW of the dilated failing LV. The PCAD is suggested for use as a permanent implantable device in CHF.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.830
Threshold uncertainty score0.884

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.117
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of the New York Academy of SciencesSame topicMechanical Circulatory Support DevicesFrench-language works237,207