Localization of broadly selective equilibrative and concentrative nucleoside transporters, hENT1 and hCNT3, in human kidney
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nucleoside transporters in kidney mediate renal reabsorption and secretion of nucleosides. Using RT-PCR, we demonstrated mRNAs encoding hENT1, hENT2, hCNT1, hCNT2, and hCNT3 in both cortex and medulla. Immunoblotting with crude membrane preparations revealed abundant hENT1 and hCNT3 in both cortex and medulla, and little, if any, hENT2, hCNT1, or hCNT2, indicating that the latter were either absent or below limits of detection of immunoassays. hENT1 immunostaining was observed on apical surfaces of proximal tubules and on both apical and basal surfaces of thick ascending loops of Henle and collecting ducts. Prominent hCNT3 immunostaining was observed on apical surfaces of proximal tubules and thick ascending loops of Henle in addition to some cytoplasmic staining. Equilibrium binding of [(3)H]nitrobenzylmercaptopurine ribonucleoside (NBMPR), a high-affinity inhibitor of hENT1, to brush-border membrane vesicles from cortex confirmed the presence of hENT1 on apical surfaces of proximal tubules. Uptake of [(3)H]uridine by polarized renal proximal tubule cells exhibited a sodium-dependent component that was inhibited by thymidine and inosine as well as a sodium-independent component that was partially inhibited by NBMPR and completely inhibited by dilazep, indicating high levels of hENT1 and hCNT3 and low levels of hENT2 activities. The presence of 1) transcripts for hENT1/2 and hCNT1/2/3 and the hENT1 and hCNT3 proteins in human kidneys and 2) hENT1, hENT2, and hCNT3 activities in cultured proximal tubule cells suggest involvement of hENT1, hCNT3, and possibly also hENT2 in renal handling of nucleosides and nucleoside drugs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".