MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2098531493 · doi:10.7202/013140ar

Sedimentological Observations from the Tiskilwa Till, Illinois, and Sky Pilot Till, Manitoba

2006· article· en· W2098531493 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Anders E. Carlson, John W. Jenson, Peter U. Clark

Bibliographic record

VenueGéographie physique et Quaternaire · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologySedimentGeomorphologyDeposition (geology)Deformation (meteorology)ThickeningSkyGeochemistryOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present sedimentological observations from the Tiskilwa Till in northern Illinois, and the Sky Pilot Till in northern Manitoba, that indicate deposition of these tills by subglacial deformation. These generally homogenous tills grade downward into more heterogeneous tills that incorporate underlying sediment into their matrix, indicating entrainment of older sediments by sediment deformation. Deformed sand inclusions within these tills imply deformation of the tills and inclusions prior to deposition. The Tiskilwa Till has relatively high fabric strength throughout its thickness, whereas fabric strength in the Sky Pilot Till generally increases up-section in 2 to 3 m thick increments. Fabric orientations in both tills rotate up-section, possibly due to changes in ice-flow direction associated with the thickening and thinning of ice, and changes in ice-flow divide location. In both the Tiskilwa and Sky Pilot Tills, the change in fabric orientation occurs over intervals of ~1 m, suggesting that the maximum depth of deformation was ≤1 m insofar as any greater depth of deformation would have reoriented till fabric during maximum ice extent and retreat. In the case of the Sky Pilot Till, the up-section increase in macrofabric strength indicates that strain increased up-section. These data suggest that these tills were deposited in a time transgressive manner as strain migrated upwards with the delivery of new till either released from the ice base or advected from up-ice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.251
Threshold uncertainty score0.505

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGéographie physique et QuaternaireSame topicGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchFrench-language works237,207