MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

FACTORS INFLUENCING DIATOM DISTRIBUTIONS IN CIRCUMPOLAR TREELINE LAKES OF NORTHERN RUSSIA

2000· article· en· W2098580515 on OpenAlexaff
Tamsin E. Laing, John P. Smol

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Phycology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiatomTundraCanonical correspondence analysisFragilariaEcologyArcticPhysical geographyPaleolimnologyEnvironmental scienceBenthic zoneOceanographyBiologyAbundance (ecology)NutrientGeologyGeographyPhytoplankton

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diatom assemblages and limnological data were analyzed from 74 lakes spanning arctic treeline in three geographical regions of northern Russia: near the mouth of the Pechora River, on the Taimyr Peninsula, and near the mouth of the Lena River. Analysis of similarities indicated that diatom assemblages in tundra and forest lakes were significantly different from each other in all regions, with tundra lakes generally associated with higher abundances of small benthic Fragilaria Lyngbye taxa. Canonical correspondence analysis identified variables related to ion concentrations (e.g. Na + , dissolved inorganic carbon), lake depth, silica concentrations, and surface water temperatures as factors that explained significant amounts of variation in the diatom assemblages. Across treeline, the generally higher surface water temperatures of the forested lakes consistently accounted for a significant proportion of the diatom distribution patterns. Major ion concentrations also explained significant amounts of variation in the diatom assemblages across treeline for all three regions; however, regional trends were most likely influenced by local factors (i.e. ocean proximity or anthropogenic activities). The importance of climatic gradients across treeline (e.g. temperature) diatom distributions provides additional evidence that diatoms may be useful as paleoclimatic indicators. However, combination of the three calibration sets revealed that local water chemistry determinants (e.g. lithology, marine influence) overrode the influence of climatic gradients in explaining diatom distributions, suggesting that regional differences must be minimized for successful combination of geographically separate calibration sets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations71
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of PhycologySame topicGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchFrench-language works237,207