MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2098637377 · doi:10.1109/tap.2007.891852

Fast Adaptive Microwave Beamforming Using Array Signal Estimation

2007· article· en· W2098637377 on OpenAlexaff
Abdel-Razik Sebak

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDirection-of-Arrival Estimation Techniques
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdaptive beamformerBeamformingEstimatorAntenna arrayWeightSignal-to-interference-plus-noise ratioComputer scienceAlgorithmQuantization (signal processing)MathematicsControl theory (sociology)Antenna (radio)AcousticsPhysicsTelecommunicationsStatisticsPower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new perturbation technique is proposed which enables adaptive beamforming (ABF) in microwave domain using a single-port beamformer. In this technique, for a system with L antennas, the weight vector is independently perturbed L times to obtain L correlated outputs. These outputs are then used to find a noisy approximation of the antenna array signal for the gradient vector estimation. The process of weight perturbations is performed faster than the Nyquist rate mainly to increase the temporal correlation of the consecutive antenna array signal samples and to lower the perturbation error. Performance of the proposed perturbation technique with the adaptive unconstrained least mean square (ULMS) algorithm is investigated for different channel scenarios. The ULMS algorithm with single-port beamformer converges in very high noise and interference levels and with a convergence speed close to that of the multi-port receiver. After convergence, both the single-port and the multiport beamformer algorithms achieve the same steady state signal to interference plus noise ratio (SINR) gain. Effects of weight quantization are also investigated for the single-port beamformer with the proposed perturbation technique

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.677
Threshold uncertainty score0.543

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and PropagationSame topicDirection-of-Arrival Estimation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207